Triage action cleanup (#16319)

.github/workflows/gemini-automated-issue-triage.yml

@@ -14,9 +14,15 @@ on:
         description: 'issue number to triage'
         required: true
         type: 'number'
+  workflow_call:
+    inputs:
+      issue_number:
+        description: 'issue number to triage'
+        required: false
+        type: 'string'
 
 concurrency:
-  group: '${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.issue.number || github.event.inputs.issue_number }}'
+  group: '${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.issue.number || github.event.inputs.issue_number || inputs.issue_number }}'
   cancel-in-progress: true
 
 defaults:
@@ -34,7 +40,7 @@ permissions:
 jobs:
   triage-issue:
     if: |-
-      github.repository == 'google-gemini/gemini-cli' &&
+      (github.repository == 'google-gemini/gemini-cli' || github.repository == 'google-gemini/maintainers-gemini-cli') &&
       (
         github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' ||
         (
@@ -57,10 +63,11 @@ jobs:
         with:
           github-token: '${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}'
           script: |
+            const issueNumber = ${{ github.event.inputs.issue_number || inputs.issue_number }};
             const { data: issue } = await github.rest.issues.get({
               owner: context.repo.owner,
               repo: context.repo.repo,
-              issue_number: ${{ github.event.inputs.issue_number }},
+              issue_number: issueNumber,
             });
             core.setOutput('title', issue.title);
             core.setOutput('body', issue.body);
@@ -71,7 +78,7 @@ jobs:
         if: |-
           github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch'
         env:
-          ISSUE_NUMBER_INPUT: '${{ github.event.inputs.issue_number }}'
+          ISSUE_NUMBER_INPUT: '${{ github.event.inputs.issue_number || inputs.issue_number }}'
           LABELS: '${{ steps.get_issue_data.outputs.labels }}'
         run: |
           if echo "${LABELS}" | grep -q 'area/'; then
@@ -127,7 +134,7 @@ jobs:
           ISSUE_BODY: >-
             ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && steps.get_issue_data.outputs.body || github.event.issue.body }}
           ISSUE_NUMBER: >-
-            ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && github.event.inputs.issue_number || github.event.issue.number }}
+            ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' && (github.event.inputs.issue_number || inputs.issue_number) || github.event.issue.number }}
           REPOSITORY: '${{ github.repository }}'
           AVAILABLE_LABELS: '${{ steps.get_labels.outputs.available_labels }}'
         with:

.github/workflows/gemini-scheduled-issue-triage.yml

@@ -116,12 +116,12 @@ jobs:
             1. You are only able to use the echo command. Review the available labels in the environment variable: "${AVAILABLE_LABELS}".
             2. Check environment variable for issues to triage: $ISSUES_TO_TRIAGE (JSON array of issues)
             3. Review the issue title, body and any comments provided in the environment variables.
-            4. Identify the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on kind/*, area/*, sub-area/* and priority/*.
+            4. Identify the most relevant labels from the existing labels, focusing on kind/* and priority/*.
-            5. If the issue already has area/ label, dont try to change it. Similarly, if the issue already has a kind/ label don't change it. And if the issue already has a priority/ label do not change it for example:
+            5. If the issue already has a kind/ label don't change it. And if the issue already has a priority/ label do not change it for example:
-               If an issue has area/core and kind/bug  you will only add a priority/ label.
+               If an issue has kind/bug you will only add a priority/ label.
-               Instead if an issue has no labels, you will could add one lable of each kind.
+               Instead if an issue has no labels, you could add one label of each kind.
             6. Identify other applicable labels based on the issue content, such as status/*, help wanted, good first issue, etc.
-            7. For area/* and kind/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label in each case.
+            7. For kind/* limit yourself to only the single most applicable label.
             8. Give me a single short explanation about why you are selecting each label in the process.
             9. Output a JSON array of objects, each containing the issue number
                and the labels to add and remove, along with an explanation. For example:
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ jobs:
             11. If you see that the issue doesn't look like it has sufficient information recommend the status/need-information label and leave a comment politely requesting the relevant information, eg.. if repro steps are missing request for repro steps. if version information is missing request for version information into the explanation section below.
               - After identifying appropriate labels to an issue, add "status/need-triage" label to labels_to_remove in the output.
             12. If you think an issue might be a Priority/P0 do not apply the priority/p0 label. Instead apply a status/manual-triage label and include a note in your explanation.
-            13. If you are uncertain and have not been able to apply one each of kind/, area/ and priority/ , apply the status/manual-triage label.
+            13. If you are uncertain and have not been able to apply one each of kind/ and priority/ , apply the status/manual-triage label.
 
             ## Guidelines
 
@@ -157,9 +157,8 @@ jobs:
               - Do not add comments or modify the issue content.
               - Do not remove the following labels maintainer, help wanted or good first issue.
               - Triage only the current issue.
-              - Identify only one area/ label
               - Identify only one kind/ label (Do not apply kind/duplicate or kind/parent-issue)
-              - Identify all applicable sub-area/* and priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these.
+              - Identify all applicable priority/* labels based on the issue content. It's ok to have multiple of these.
               - Once you categorize the issue if it needs information bump down the priority by 1 eg.. a p0 would become a p1 a p1 would become a p2. P2 and P3 can stay as is in this scenario.
             Categorization Guidelines:
             P0: Critical / Blocker
@@ -206,51 +205,6 @@ jobs:
               - If users are talking about issues where the model gets downgraded from pro to flash then i want you to categorize that as a performance issue
               - This product is designed to use different models eg.. using pro, downgrading to flash etc.
               - When users report that they dont expect the model to change those would be categorized as feature requests.
-            Definition of Areas
-            area/ux:
-              - Issues concerning user-facing elements like command usability, interactive features, help docs, and perceived performance.
-              - I am seeing my screen flicker when using Gemini CLI
-              - I am seeing the output malformed
-              - Theme changes aren't taking effect
-              - My keyboard inputs arent' being recognzied
-            area/platform:
-              - Issues related to installation, packaging, OS compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux), and the underlying CLI framework.
-            area/background: Issues related to long-running background tasks, daemons, and autonomous or proactive agent features.
-            area/models:
-              - i am not getting a response that is reasonable or expected. this can include things like
-              - I am calling a tool and the tool is not performing as expected.
-              - i am expecting a tool to be called and it is not getting called ,
-              - Including experience when using
-              - built-in tools (e.g., web search, code interpreter, read file, writefile, etc..),
-              - Function calling issues should be under this area
-              - i am getting responses from the model that are malformed.
-              - Issues concerning Gemini quality of response and inference,
-              - Issues talking about unnecessary token consumption.
-              - Issues talking about Model getting stuck in a loop be watchful as this could be the root cause for issues that otherwise seem like model performance issues.
-              - Memory compression
-              - unexpected responses,
-              - poor quality of generated code
-            area/tools:
-              - These are primarily issues related to Model Context Protocol
-              - These are issues that mention MCP support
-              - feature requests asking for support for new tools.
-            area/core:
-              - Issues with fundamental components like command parsing, configuration management, session state, and the main API client logic. Introducing multi-modality
-            area/contribution:
-              - Issues related to improving the developer contribution experience, such as CI/CD pipelines, build scripts, and test automation infrastructure.
-            area/authentication:
-              -  Issues related to user identity, login flows, API key handling, credential storage, and access token management, unable to sign in selecting wrong authentication path etc..
-            area/security-privacy:
-              - Issues concerning vulnerability patching, dependency security, data sanitization, privacy controls, and preventing unauthorized data access.
-            area/extensibility:
-              - Issues related to the plugin system, extension APIs, or making the CLI's functionality available in other applications, github actions, ide support etc..
-            area/performance:
-              - Issues focused on model performance
-              - Issues with running out of capacity,
-              - 429 errors etc..
-              - could also pertain to latency,
-              - other general software performance like, memory usage, CPU consumption, and algorithmic efficiency.
-              - Switching models from one to the other unexpectedly.
 
       - name: 'Apply Labels to Issues'
         if: |-

scripts/relabel_issues.sh

@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# scripts/relabel_issues.sh
+# Usage: ./scripts/relabel_issues.sh <old-label> <new-label> [repository]
+
+set -e
+
+OLD_LABEL="$1"
+NEW_LABEL="$2"
+REPO="${3:-google-gemini/gemini-cli}"
+
+if [ -z "$OLD_LABEL" ] || [ -z "$NEW_LABEL" ]; then
+  echo "Usage: $0 <old-label> <new-label> [repository]"
+  echo "Example: $0 'area/models' 'area/agent'"
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "🔍 Searching for open issues in '$REPO' with label '$OLD_LABEL'..."
+
+# Fetch issues with the old label
+ISSUES=$(gh issue list --repo "$REPO" --label "$OLD_LABEL" --state open --limit 1000 --json number,title)
+
+COUNT=$(echo "$ISSUES" | jq '. | length')
+
+if [ "$COUNT" -eq 0 ]; then
+  echo "✅ No issues found with label '$OLD_LABEL'."
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+echo "found $COUNT issues to relabel."
+
+# Iterate and update
+echo "$ISSUES" | jq -r '.[] | "\(.number) \(.title)"' | while read -r number title; do
+  echo "🔄 Processing #$number: $title"
+  echo "   - Removing: $OLD_LABEL"
+  echo "   + Adding:   $NEW_LABEL"
+  
+  gh issue edit "$number" --repo "$REPO" --add-label "$NEW_LABEL" --remove-label "$OLD_LABEL"
+  
+  echo "   ✅ Done."
+done
+
+echo "🎉 All issues relabeled!"