Slightly more realistic test.

This commit is contained in:
Christian Gunderman
2026-01-28 18:00:56 -08:00
parent 4e1fa84d75
commit 3d38eeb0f4

View File

@@ -17,10 +17,18 @@ describe('Frugal reads eval', () => {
evalTest('ALWAYS_PASSES', {
name: 'should use ranged read when specific line is targeted',
files: {
'eslint.config.mjs': `export default [
{
files: ["**/*.ts"],
rules: {
"no-var": "error"
}
}
];`,
'linter_mess.ts': (() => {
const lines = [];
for (let i = 0; i < 4000; i++) {
if (i === 3000) {
if (i === 1000 || i === 1040 || i === 3000) {
lines.push(`var oldVar${i} = "needs fix";`);
} else {
lines.push(`const goodVar${i} = "clean";`);
@@ -29,8 +37,7 @@ describe('Frugal reads eval', () => {
return lines.join('\n');
})(),
},
prompt:
'Fix the linter error on line 3000 of linter_mess.ts. The error is the use of "var".',
prompt: 'Fix all linter errors in linter_mess.ts. Run eslint to find them.',
assert: async (rig, result) => {
const logs = rig.readToolLogs();
@@ -38,32 +45,46 @@ describe('Frugal reads eval', () => {
const readCalls = logs.filter(
(log) => log.toolRequest?.name === READ_FILE_TOOL_NAME,
);
const targetFileReads = readCalls.filter((call) => {
const args = JSON.parse(call.toolRequest.args);
return args.file_path.includes('linter_mess.ts');
});
expect(
readCalls.length,
targetFileReads.length,
'Agent should have used read_file to check context',
).toBeGreaterThan(0);
let targetedReadFound = false;
// We expect 2-3 ranges: one covering 1000/1040 (or two separate ones) and one for 3000
expect(
targetFileReads.length,
'Agent should have used 2-3 ranged reads on the target file',
).toBeGreaterThanOrEqual(2);
expect(
targetFileReads.length,
'Agent should have used 2-3 ranged reads on the target file',
).toBeLessThanOrEqual(3);
let totalLinesRead = 0;
const readRanges: { offset: number; limit: number }[] = [];
for (const call of readCalls) {
for (const call of targetFileReads) {
const args = JSON.parse(call.toolRequest.args);
if (args.file_path.includes('linter_mess.ts')) {
totalLinesRead += args.limit ?? 4000;
// file_path check is redundant now but harmless
const limit = args.limit ?? 4000;
const offset = args.offset ?? 0;
totalLinesRead += limit;
readRanges.push({ offset, limit });
expect(
args.limit,
'Agent read the entire file (missing limit) instead of using ranged read',
).toBeDefined();
expect(
args.limit,
'Agent read the entire file (missing limit) instead of using ranged read',
).toBeDefined();
expect(args.limit, 'Agent read too many lines at once').toBeLessThan(
1000,
);
if (args.offset !== undefined && args.offset > 2000) {
targetedReadFound = true;
}
}
expect(args.limit, 'Agent read too many lines at once').toBeLessThan(
1000,
);
}
// Ranged read shoud be frugal and just enough to satisfy the task at hand.
@@ -72,10 +93,16 @@ describe('Frugal reads eval', () => {
'Agent read more of the file than expected',
).toBeLessThan(500);
expect(
targetedReadFound,
'Agent should have used offset to read around line 3000 at least once',
).toBe(true);
// Check that we read around the error lines
const errorLines = [1000, 1040, 3000];
for (const line of errorLines) {
const covered = readRanges.some(
(range) => line >= range.offset && line < range.offset + range.limit,
);
expect(covered, `Agent should have read around line ${line}`).toBe(
true,
);
}
},
});
});