MediaMetz/gemini-cli
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/google-gemini/gemini-cli.git synced 2026-03-10 14:10:37 -07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Encourage agent to utilize ecosystem tools to perform work (#17881)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Christian Gunderman
2026-02-04 02:02:25 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent aba8c5f662
commit ed02b94570
3 changed files with 186 additions and 16 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

170
evals/automated-tool-use.eval.ts Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
/**
* @license
* Copyright 2026 Google LLC
* SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
*/
import { describe, expect } from 'vitest';
import { evalTest } from './test-helper.js';
describe('Automated tool use', () => {
/**
* Tests that the agent always utilizes --fix when calling eslint.
* We provide a 'lint' script in the package.json, which helps elicit
* a repro by guiding the agent into using the existing deficient script.
*/
evalTest('USUALLY_PASSES', {
name: 'should use automated tools (eslint --fix) to fix code style issues',
files: {
'package.json': JSON.stringify(
{
name: 'typescript-project',
version: '1.0.0',
type: 'module',
scripts: {
lint: 'eslint .',
},
devDependencies: {
eslint: '^9.0.0',
globals: '^15.0.0',
typescript: '^5.0.0',
'typescript-eslint': '^8.0.0',
'@eslint/js': '^9.0.0',
},
},
null,
2,
),
'eslint.config.js': `
import globals from "globals";
import pluginJs from "@eslint/js";
import tseslint from "typescript-eslint";
export default [
{
files: ["**/*.{js,mjs,cjs,ts}"],
languageOptions: {
globals: globals.node
}
},
pluginJs.configs.recommended,
...tseslint.configs.recommended,
{
rules: {
"prefer-const": "error",
"@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars": "off"
}
}
];
`,
'src/app.ts': `
export function main() {
let count = 10;
console.log(count);
}
`,
},
prompt:
'Fix the linter errors in this project. Make sure to avoid interactive commands.',
assert: async (rig) => {
// Check if run_shell_command was used with --fix
const toolCalls = rig.readToolLogs();
const shellCommands = toolCalls.filter(
(call) => call.toolRequest.name === 'run_shell_command',
);
const hasFixCommand = shellCommands.some((call) => {
let args = call.toolRequest.args;
if (typeof args === 'string') {
try {
args = JSON.parse(args);
} catch (e) {
return false;
}
}
const cmd = (args as any)['command'];
return (
cmd &&
(cmd.includes('eslint') || cmd.includes('npm run lint')) &&
cmd.includes('--fix')
);
});
expect(
hasFixCommand,
'Expected agent to use eslint --fix via run_shell_command',
).toBe(true);
},
});
/**
* Tests that the agent uses prettier --write to fix formatting issues in files
* instead of trying to edit the files itself.
*/
evalTest('USUALLY_PASSES', {
name: 'should use automated tools (prettier --write) to fix formatting issues',
files: {
'package.json': JSON.stringify(
{
name: 'typescript-project',
version: '1.0.0',
type: 'module',
scripts: {},
devDependencies: {
prettier: '^3.0.0',
typescript: '^5.0.0',
},
},
null,
2,
),
'.prettierrc': JSON.stringify(
{
semi: true,
singleQuote: true,
},
null,
2,
),
'src/app.ts': `
export function main() {
const data={ name:'test',
val:123
}
console.log(data)
}
`,
},
prompt:
'Fix the formatting errors in this project. Make sure to avoid interactive commands.',
assert: async (rig) => {
// Check if run_shell_command was used with --write
const toolCalls = rig.readToolLogs();
const shellCommands = toolCalls.filter(
(call) => call.toolRequest.name === 'run_shell_command',
);
const hasFixCommand = shellCommands.some((call) => {
let args = call.toolRequest.args;
if (typeof args === 'string') {
try {
args = JSON.parse(args);
} catch (e) {
return false;
}
}
const cmd = (args as any)['command'];
return (
cmd &&
cmd.includes('prettier') &&
(cmd.includes('--write') || cmd.includes('-w'))
);
});
expect(
hasFixCommand,
'Expected agent to use prettier --write via run_shell_command',
).toBe(true);
},
});
});

30
packages/core/src/core/__snapshots__/prompts.test.ts.snap
View File

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ Mock Agent Directory
When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring, or explaining code, follow this sequence:
1. **Understand & Strategize:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. When the task involves **complex refactoring, codebase exploration or system-wide analysis**, your **first and primary action** must be to delegate to the 'codebase_investigator' agent using the 'codebase_investigator' tool. Use it to build a comprehensive understanding of the code, its structure, and dependencies. For **simple, targeted searches** (like finding a specific function name, file path, or variable declaration), you should use 'grep_search' or 'glob' directly.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. If 'codebase_investigator' was used, do not ignore the output of the agent, you must use it as the foundation of your plan. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1067,7 +1067,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1166,7 +1166,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.
@@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring,
1. **Understand:** Think about the user's request and the relevant codebase context. Use 'grep_search' and 'glob' search tools extensively (in parallel if independent) to understand file structures, existing code patterns, and conventions.
Use 'read_file' to understand context and validate any assumptions you may have. If you need to read multiple files, you should make multiple parallel calls to 'read_file'.
2. **Plan:** Build a coherent and grounded (based on the understanding in step 1) plan for how you intend to resolve the user's task. If the user's request implies a change but does not explicitly state it, **YOU MUST ASK** for confirmation before modifying code. Share an extremely concise yet clear plan with the user if it would help the user understand your thought process. As part of the plan, you should use an iterative development process that includes writing unit tests to verify your changes. Use output logs or debug statements as part of this process to arrive at a solution.
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., 'replace', 'write_file' 'run_shell_command' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards. If unsure about these commands, you can ask the user if they'd like you to run them and if so how to.
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.

2
packages/core/src/prompts/snippets.ts
View File

@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ export function renderPrimaryWorkflows(
When requested to perform tasks like fixing bugs, adding features, refactoring, or explaining code, follow this sequence:
${workflowStepUnderstand(options)}
${workflowStepPlan(options)}
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., '${EDIT_TOOL_NAME}', '${WRITE_FILE_TOOL_NAME}' '${SHELL_TOOL_NAME}' ...) to act on the plan, strictly adhering to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates').
3. **Implement:** Use the available tools (e.g., '${EDIT_TOOL_NAME}', '${WRITE_FILE_TOOL_NAME}' '${SHELL_TOOL_NAME}' ...) to act on the plan. Strictly adhere to the project's established conventions (detailed under 'Core Mandates'). Before making manual code changes, check if an ecosystem tool (like 'eslint --fix', 'prettier --write', 'go fmt', 'cargo fmt') is available in the project to perform the task automatically.
4. **Verify (Tests):** If applicable and feasible, verify the changes using the project's testing procedures. Identify the correct test commands and frameworks by examining 'README' files, build/package configuration (e.g., 'package.json'), or existing test execution patterns. NEVER assume standard test commands. When executing test commands, prefer "run once" or "CI" modes to ensure the command terminates after completion.
5. **Verify (Standards):** VERY IMPORTANT: After making code changes, execute the project-specific build, linting and type-checking commands (e.g., 'tsc', 'npm run lint', 'ruff check .') that you have identified for this project (or obtained from the user). This ensures code quality and adherence to standards.${workflowVerifyStandardsSuffix(options.interactive)}
6. **Finalize:** After all verification passes, consider the task complete. Do not remove or revert any changes or created files (like tests). Await the user's next instruction.